Los Angeles

Cities that failed to meet California’s housing deadline seek rezoning extension – Daily News

Local and state officers are engaged on a deal to soften penalties affecting nearly each Southern California metropolis and county for failing to undertake state-approved housing plans by a February deadline.

Under a brand new regulation adopted simply final fall, these cities now are required to rezone land wanted to meet state housing targets by Oct. 15, as a substitute of the same old three-year timeline.

If they fail to meet the rezoning deadline, the state can discover them out of compliance with state housing legal guidelines, exposing them to lawsuits, stiff fines, a cutoff of housing grants and a lack of native management over planning selections.

“Everyone was late, and so it’s been very hard because at the same time … (state housing officials) were sending letters saying, ‘You’re out of compliance, you could like lose your funding.’ And that is sending all the cities into, you know, crazy mode,” mentioned Guy Strahl, chief of employees for invoice creator Richard Bloom, D-Santa Monica. “It’s driving all the cities crazy.”

Just 5 cities and one county within the six-county Southern California Association of Governments area — Duarte, San Gabriel, Victorville, Westlake Village, Wildomar and the county of Ventura — met the Feb. 11 deadline to undertake a state-certified plan, or “housing element.”

Read extra: Yorba Linda is Orange County’s first city to adopt state-mandated housing plan

The remaining 191 jurisdictions within the SCAG area now have solely till Oct. 15 to rezone land wanted to accommodate huge increases in state-mandated homebuilding goals — a time-consuming activity many cities mentioned is unimaginable to accomplish by the autumn.

Kome Ajise, SCAG’s govt director, mentioned his company had been searching for extra time for rezoning since final year as a result of the brand new measure, Assembly Bill 1398, “changed the rules of the game” simply because the area’s localities have been within the strategy of revising their housing plans.

“We knew immediately when 1398 passed it was going to be a problem,” Ajise mentioned. “Given the number of cities that we had just beginning to get their housing elements done, it was going to be impossible to meet the deadline.”

A proposed compromise seeks to create a Southern California exception to AB 1398.

Strahl mentioned housing advocates, representatives of the state Housing and Community Development Department and Bloom have been engaged on an modification giving Southern California cities “a little more time” for the rezoning course of.

The compromise invoice’s provisions are nonetheless being labored out, Strahl mentioned. Bloom is hoping to finalize its language quickly so it may be launched as an “urgency” measure, permitting it to take impact instantly upon passage.

“There’s multiple issues going on. … We’re still trying to make sure (state housing officials are) comfortable. We’re trying to make sure that the Senate is comfortable. So there’s a lot of people we’re still checking in with,” Strahl mentioned.

‘Difficult task’

AB 1398 is likely one of the newest in a collection of latest legal guidelines drafted over the previous 5 years to beef up the state’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment, or RHNA, course of. The half-century-old statute requires California cities and counties to plan for his or her truthful share of housing in any respect revenue ranges. As a part of that course of, native governments are required to replace the housing aspect of their common plans not less than as soon as each eight years.

In response to the housing disaster, the state created new strategies for assessing housing wants that resulted within the tripling of the SCAG area’s homebuilding purpose to 1.34 million properties by the top of the last decade. For some cities, the elevated targets would enhance their housing stock by 40% or extra by October 2029.

Numerous cities mentioned it could be unimaginable for them to full the time-consuming rezoning course of on such an enormous scale because the course of consists of public hearings and environmental evaluations beneath the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA.

Meeting an Oct. 15 rezoning deadline “is going to be very difficult,” mentioned Manhattan Beach Planning Manager Tylyn Mirzakhanian.

“It is a very difficult task to demonstrate capacity for 774 new units in a small city that is completely built out,” Mirzakhanian mentioned. ” … We don’t have a single vacant web site to depend on. And so, we have been hit with very stringent necessities due to that.”

Long Beach Planning Manager Alison Spindler-Ruiz mentioned her metropolis can’t complete the rezoning of about 800 parcels till someday subsequent year, despite the fact that town obtained a head begin after just lately updating its land-use plan.

“The rezoning process takes a whole host of extensive community engagements,” Spindler-Ruiz mentioned. “(They include the) noticing of public hearings, mailings and (the holding of) public hearings by both the planning commission and the city council.”

The metropolis of Los Angeles wants to rezone sufficient land to accommodate about 255,000 extra housing models, town mentioned in a press release. Officials recognized about 243,000 “candidate sites” on the record for potential rezoning. Even three years will not be sufficient time to accomplish that activity, the assertion indicated.

“Rezoning efforts typically take several years from community engagement and initiation to adoption,” it mentioned. “A one-year timeline appears to be infeasible … and even a three-year timeline is significantly expedited.”

In Redondo Beach, rezoning would require voter approval, mentioned Community Development Director Brandy Forbes. The soonest town would have the opportunity to get such a measure on the poll can be March 2023.

“We can do it within a three-year timeframe,” Forbes mentioned. “We just can’t do it in one year.”

Stiff sanctions

Under AB 1398, cities that fail to meet the October rezoning deadline can be dominated out of compliance with the state’s housing aspect regulation, setting in movement a big selection of potential penalties.

Non-compliant jurisdictions face the lack of quite a few state and federal grants, together with aggressive grants for fixing roads, including bike lanes, enhancing transit or constructing reasonably priced housing.

They additionally can not deny reasonably priced housing initiatives for being inconsistent with zoning or the overall plan and face potential lawsuits with fines starting from $10,000 to $100,000 a month. Fines will be multiplied by six for jurisdictions that proceed to be out of compliance.

Bloom mentioned in a press launch when AB 1398 was signed into regulation that the measure was designed to incentivize cities to undertake their up to date housing parts on time.

“Unfortunately, there have been instances where cities deliberately adopt faulty housing elements to avoid building their fair share of housing,” Bloom mentioned. “As the housing crisis grows in California, it is critical that every local government adopt a plan that meets the requirements of state law (and) that they do it on time.”

State officers say 185 Southern California cities and 5 of the area’s six counties failed to replace their housing plans by a Feb. 11 deadline, exposing them to a number of sanctions in the event that they don’t full wanted rezoning by subsequent Oct. 15. A proposed deal now within the works would give these cities extra time to rezone. (Photo by Mark Rightmire, Orange County Register/SCNG)

SCAG chief Ajise mentioned harder planning and truthful housing necessities, coupled with COVID-19 lockdowns and delays in figuring out native housing allocations, put the area’s cities and counties about six months behind in adopting their new housing parts.

Most cities had a draft housing aspect completed by final October, however the back-and-forth strategy of getting housing division evaluations and making revisions pushed most jurisdictions previous the Feb. 11 deadline to get state approval.

“The process is not that easy,” Ajise mentioned. ” … We didn’t anticipate that regulation would change the foundations of the sport whereas we have been in course of. So, (AB 1398) didn’t come as a shock to us, however we have been additionally not anticipating that it could apply to us.”

Housing advocates expressed conditional assist for a rezoning extension, saying they need to spare cities the consequence of shedding reasonably priced housing grants, however don’t need to allow them to off the hook for not getting their housing plans completed on time.

“While we want there to be consequences, we don’t want to make the situation worse by (cities) losing affordable housing money,” mentioned Leonora Camner, govt director of Abundant Housing LA.

“SCAG got caught in kind of the middle of this,” added Kennedy Commission Executive Director Cesar Covarrubias, an reasonably priced housing advocate. “We understand there are cities like L.A. that have thousands of sites. It’s a bigger challenge for them. … But we need to hold cities accountable.”

Back to top button