Politics

‘We’ve Harmed the Senate Enough’: Why Joe Manchin Won’t Budge on the Filibuster

Q: The Democratic Party thought it might take again the Senate this yr, and there’s nonetheless an opportunity that possibly that may occur should you get each of the seats in Georgia. But to be able to cross main laws, you would need to both get some Republican assist or kill the filibuster. You’ve lengthy opposed killing the filibuster. Why is that?

A: I can guarantee you I can’t vote to finish the filibuster, as a result of that will break the Senate. We’ve harmed the Senate sufficient with the nuclear choice on the judges. We’re making lifetime appointments based mostly on a easy majority. The minority ought to have enter — that’s the complete goal for the Senate. If you principally dispose of the filibuster altogether for laws, you received’t have the Senate. You’re a glorified House. And I can’t try this.

Q: So there’s no subject the place you’d agree to finish the filibuster? Let’s say there’s a badly wanted new coronavirus stimulus package deal, and the Republicans received’t make a deal.

A: No. If we are able to’t come collectively to assist America, God assist us. If you’ve obtained to explode the Senate to do the proper factor, then we’ve obtained the flawed folks in the Senate, or now we have those that received’t discuss to one another. You know, I’ve all the time mentioned this: Chuck Schumer, together with his persona, he’ll discuss to anyone and all people. You can work with Chuck. Chuck goes to strive every little thing he can do to attempt to have interaction with Mitch once more.

Q: Are there every other points the place you’d draw a line in the sand and stand as much as different members of your occasion?

A: I’ve executed that. I used to be that one vote for Brett Kavanaugh. I believed there needed to be proof, and I by no means noticed proof. The nation was in a feeding frenzy. And there was no Democrat that was going to buck that. I mentioned, ‘I’m not going to wreck an individual’s life as a result of there’s no proof.’

And wouldn’t it’s so befitting if he votes to uphold the Affordable Care Act? God, oh my. Redemption! Is there redemption right here? He and I had a protracted dialog, and I principally mentioned, ‘I’m pleading with you and your inside conscience, every time this comes earlier than you, I would like you to consider 800,000 West Virginians who couldn’t get insurance coverage earlier than due to a pre-existing situation. I would like you to consider 160,000 West Virginians that have been so poor, that they had nothing.’

Source

Back to top button