San Diego

San Diego, CA leaders react to possible overturning of Roe v. Wad

Politico reported Monday that the nation’s highest courtroom would possibly quickly strike down the 1973 Roe v. Wade determination and 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey ruling.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Calif. — Local and state Democratic officers are vowing to shield abortion rights in response to a report that the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to overturn the landmark protections supplied by the Roe v. Wade determination that has dictated coverage on the difficulty since 1973.

“It’s time for Congress to get off the sidelines,” Sen. Alex Padilla, D-California, tweeted in response to the report. “We must protect the fundamental right to choose.”

Politico reported Monday that the nation’s highest courtroom would possibly quickly strike down the 1973 Roe v. Wade determination and 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey ruling. Politico obtained what it known as a draft ruling written by Justice Samuel Alito that opines, partly, “`Roe’ was egregiously wrong from the start.”‘

“We hold that ‘Roe’ and ‘Casey’ must be overruled,” the doc states, in accordance to Politico. “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Politico famous that the doc is simply a draft and might be modified dramatically, and even essentially modified, earlier than it’s revealed and finalized this summer season.

Chief Justice John Roberts reiterated that time Tuesday, saying the draft “does not represent a decision by the court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case.”

But information of the ruling sparked a flurry of concern from many Democratic California elected leaders.

“Make no mistake, if Roe v. Wade is overturned, women will be harmed and some will die,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, tweeted Tuesday morning. “It occurred earlier than Roe turned regulation of the land and it’ll occur once more, notably since this determination will hurt low-income and at-risk girls greater than anybody.

“I remember the days when abortion was illegal, when we would pass the hat at Stanford to collect money so a classmate could go to Mexico for an abortion. Overturning Roe would return us to those dark ages where women don’t have safe, open access to reproductive care. This would be unconscionable.”

Feinstein added she routinely asks Supreme Court nominees if they’ll respect Supreme Court precedent. “Without exception, all nominees agree that precedent is critical to our judicial system,” she tweeted.

“Our daughters, sisters, mothers and grandmothers will not be silenced,” Gov. Gavin Newsom tweeted. “The world is about to hear their fury. California will not sit back. We are going to fight like hell.”

Newsom has already acknowledged that he would work to guarantee California is a secure haven for girls in search of abortions or different reproductive well being care, regardless of the place they stay. Striking down Roe v. Wade would permit particular person states to set limits on abortion.

Later Monday night time, Newsom, Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, D- Lakewood, and Senate President Pro Tempore Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, released a statement that they might suggest “an amendment to enshrine the right to choose in our state constitution so that there is no doubt as to the right to abortion in this state.”

“We know we can’t trust the Supreme Court to protect reproductive rights, so California will build a firewall around this right in our state constitution,” the assertion stated. “Women will remain protected here.”

The proposed modification is unlikely to have a lot of a sensible impact as a result of of current state legal guidelines.

Nathan Fletcher, chairman of San Diego County Board of Supervisors, released the following statement Monday night time: “This draft opinion is wrongheaded, regressive and creates an uneven landscape for the reproductive rights of women across our country. We need Congress to act and pass the Women’s Health Protection Act and I vow to continue to fight for a woman’s right to choose what they do with their body.”

San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria took to Twitter to categorical his willingness to battle the ruling.

“If tonight’s news reports are accurate, it appears our worst fears about this #SCOTUS may come true, and women will be robbed of the Constitutional right to exercise control over their bodies. If #RoeVWade is overturned, we must do all we can to secure reproductive rights,” he wrote. “I will stand with you and fight with everything I have.”

Rep. Mike Levin, D-Dana Point, stated if the ruling reported by Politico is finalized, “it would be devastating for women everywhere.”

“The radical majority (on the Supreme Court) would be throwing away decades of precedent and jeopardizing the health and lives of women,” he wrote on Twitter. “It’s beyond shameful. Remember this November. I am proud to be an original co-sponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would codify `Roe’ into law. The Senate needs to act on this legislation. The filibuster must not continue to be used as an excuse.”

On its social media channels, Planned Parenthood posted, “Let’s be clear: This is a draft opinion. It’s outrageous, it’s unprecedented but it is not final. Abortion is your right — and it is STILL LEGAL.”

WATCH RELATED: California politicians react to possible overturn of Roe v. Wade (May 3, 2022)

Back to top button