Public Not Sold On Military Drone Flights Over San Diego, Says Defense Contractor

September 1, 2021

Developments on the federal degree over the past year may make military-grade drone patrols a extra widespread prevalence in Southern California — however the truth that the general public is not heat to the thought stays a problem, in accordance with a San Diego protection contractor’s report.

As a part of a nationwide effort to combine unmanned aerial automobiles into the civil airspace, General Atomics proposed flying the SkyGuardian above town of San Diego in 2020. The company stated it needed to indicate off the capabilities of its know-how to survey infrastructure and the surroundings, however data obtained by Voice of San Diego final year revealed that it was additionally curious about catching speeders on the freeway and wooing foreign diplomats.

In the method, General Atomics was making an attempt to open the skies above U.S. cities to new and unprecedented types of surveillance. But it was compelled to reroute its take a look at flight to the desert after regulators pushed back.

While the new report from General Atomics doesn’t rule out the possibility that the SkyGuardian will someday fly over San Diego’s city panorama, it lays out quite a few ongoing obstacles to getting there, what it calls the “pillars of airspace access.” These are summarized as airworthiness, pilot {qualifications} and operational approval.

But the fourth and most vital, so far as General Atomics sees it, is public notion. Without vast assist, the company warned, your complete drone integration project is unsure.

“Unless the public recognizes the benefits of commercial aviation and accepts the attendant or perceived risks, it would not matter how strong the pillars are,” the report states.

C. Mark Brinkley, a spokesman for General Atomics, stated the company has no quick plans to fly over San Diego.

“We do see a future where routine, efficient [unmanned aerial system] operations in various types of airspace and locations are common and well understood by the public,” he wrote in an electronic mail. “The [Federal Aviation Administration] has a detailed process for the manufacturer or operator of any experimental aircraft (manned or unmanned) to fly over densely populated areas, so we would expect them to apply the same rigorous safety standards to us as they would to any aircraft.”

For years, the FAA has been making an attempt to accelerate the integration of drones into industrial society by partnering with state, native and tribal governments, in addition to drone operators and producers. The company has said outright that its objective is to create “community acceptance of drones operating near their neighborhoods and businesses.”

Chula Vista has been on the forefront of this national effort, incomes permission to make use of small, commercially accessible drones as first responders throughout emergency calls. With a wingspan of 79 ft and weighing upward of 12,000 kilos, the SkyGuardian falls properly outdoors the scope of what Chula Vista and different cities are doing.

Chula Vista’s program has loads of critics and has already sparked a lawsuit, however the opposition to military-grade drones in civilian airspace is on one other degree. The nervousness relies not solely on measurement and capabilities, however historical past. The SkyGuardian is a variation of the missile-equipped Predator drone, which was central to the War on Terror and U.S. counterinsurgency efforts overseas.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection dispatched a military-grade drone to Minneapolis final summer season following the civil unrest triggered by the homicide of George Floyd. The choice to watch protesters was denounced by the ACLU and members of Congress and triggered confusion at the state level, the place the governor had just lately signed a invoice prohibiting regulation enforcement businesses from utilizing drones and different applied sciences for mass information assortment with no warrant.

There’s additionally a question of security. Military-grade drones have crashed on occasion within the United States. In 2014, U.S. Customs and Border Protection deliberately drowned one within the waters outdoors San Diego following a mechanical failure. Another crashed right into a Syracuse, N.Y., runway final summer season however the Air Force waited almost a year to inform anybody about it as a result of “it didn’t have any impact on our neighbors or the general public.”

Barry Summers, an activist and researcher who lives in North Carolina, warned last year in an opinion piece for the Washington Examiner that most of the top-ranking folks on the FAA overseeing the mixing of military-grade drones are ex-military officers. He informed me that the company’s long-term plans are being laid with none public debate.

“As the San Diego fiasco shows, they are just doing it — safety and civil liberties be damned,” he wrote in an electronic mail. “Worse still, we are exporting this to allied countries — the ability to treat your own citizens as the enemy.”

Over the final couple years, worldwide press reviews present that Australia and others have expressed curiosity in shopping for military-grade drones from the United States. One such proposal in India was value a reported $3 billion.

Under strain from drone manufactures, the Trump administration in 2020 reinterpreted a Cold War-era settlement to permit corporations like General Atomics to sell more drones to less stable governments, Reuters reported. In the meantime, protests have been organized this summer in opposition to check flights over civilian airspace in England and Scotland.

Generally, General Atomics in its report seen its efforts in San Diego in a optimistic mild due to what it discovered in regards to the regulatory course of, which it characterised as nonetheless being in an toddler stage of life.

“We should have expected some teething troubles and allowed even more time than six months before the need date for processing and approval,” the report states.

General Atomics submitted its preliminary request for the San Diego flight in September 2019, and the negotiations did not conclude till shortly earlier than takeoff.

The frustration seems to have been mutual. Emails launched via a VOSD lawsuit present that regulators had security issues in regards to the drone and expressed frustration over the timeline they’d been given. There was even a suggestion from inside the FAA that it had prematurely given the go-ahead on a earlier demonstration.

But the report additionally notes that, in June 2020, representatives from either side kicked off a sequence of conferences meant to “reset expectations” and make the approval course of simpler going ahead. General Atomics famous that, whereas it was disillusioned in how the San Diego proposal turned out, the FAA had agreed “to make it possible for [General Atomic] to repeat elements of the [Systems Integration and Operationalization] demo flight as originally planned, at a later date.”

General Atomics proposed a brand new flight close to San Diego however once more the regulators stated no. The company recommended taking off from the Gray Butte airport in Los Angeles County, crossing over what seems to be Camp Pendleton and down the coast to Point Loma earlier than making its technique to Imperial County. Instead, the FAA supplied a brand new route that went eastward, away from California’s second largest metropolis by inhabitants — finally out to the Grand Canyon — in September.

Looking again, the report famous that although the FAA cannot grant entry over restricted navy airspace, General Atomics “could have pre-coordinated with military authorities for the date of flight.” Brinkley stated the Department of Defense has a course of for any civilian plane producers and operators to petition for entry to its restricted airspace, and the FAA just isn’t essentially concerned.

The report itself means that regulators’ issues weren’t baseless. Specifically, they have been frightened that the drone would possibly lose connection in a busy air hall or that the know-how able to detecting and avoiding one other object would possibly fail.

General Atomics acknowledged that throughout the nine-and-a-half-hour flight that befell in April 2020, “there were a few, brief instances” when the show for the detect-and-avoid software minimize out for 30 to 40 seconds, “indicating temporary loss of traffic data.” But it additionally claimed that the pilot didn’t lose command or management of the plane and that the technical subject had since been corrected.

Brinkley informed me that the protection of the flight was by no means compromised and that the onboard transponder and visitors alert and collision avoidance system remained totally practical all through, “providing the same safety net as onboard all commercial airline flights in the U.S.”

When requested if one other attainable flight over San Diego was within the works, the FAA’s office of communications deferred inquiries to General Atomics and confirmed in a quick assertion that it “works closely with drone operators to ensure they operate safely.”

Voice of San Diego is a nonprofit information group supported by our members. We reveal why issues are the best way they’re and expose details that folks in energy may not need on the market and clarify advanced native public coverage points so that you will be engaged and make good choices. Sign up for our newsletters at

Exit mobile version